لیا
contained in the Sched.
we ought
I am not satisfied about
anc
✔
منسا مسا هه مدا
and in working to the Ad.
lo diret altention to the following:
Sched para 3 (a)
Assuming that it
is desirable to
A
limit the punishment of death to murder and
པ་
B
C
hunting, 8.52
is not the right place to do it.
liit
or punishments
la
This merely contains a
which
may
be awarded, in order of severity, and
ss. 2 on ward actually specify the punishment.
In 55. 2, 345 the punishment for acting
traitorously is dealt
mly:
le
: and
tem &fect-of
the ammoment proposed to 1.52 (1) would be to render these wines impunishable.
The same difficilly will arise with report lo
penal servitude when it in the only punishment
(8.9.5.45.
they have
in the case
I sodomy), smie 3.52 by para 3(6) 17 we just shuch it out of the Sched.
4 (c) The whole of
5
P. 53 (1) in delhi. But
what about ten / waision That
is to be subject to tekuhon?
ho
Hein
If the intention here is to provide that all sentuce, Na court martial must be confirmed by the bow.
Except in a case of mutiny, this showed he said; 53 (3) is not at all clear,
the refuence
because 8.53(3) son not beef /covide
about unling, it merely cepto it again.
any thing
The usull
usuel of
tivi Proviso seems to be rather to
Succefit from a fum tot foo allow sentences
coftum
of death to be confirmed by "the commander-in-chief
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.